Evaluating Human Resource to Implement SCP Using Grey Relational Analysis
Keywords:Sustainable Consumption and Production, Human Resource, Success Factors, Grey Relational Analysis.
In order to overcome the situation of misuse of earth and society, a large pressure is building around all the factors
of the humankind to successfully adopt and implement sustainable manufacturing at various stages of the supply
chains. In the present study six factors of human resources are identified and categorized in the Indian automobile
industry context. The Grey relational analysis (GRA) technique is utilized to evaluate the success factors. The Grey
relational analysis (GRA) is a qualitative and quantitative approach that is used widely as a multi-criterion decision
making (MCDM) method to solve the complicated relationship problems having uncertainties. The factor
‘Commitment and transparency of stakeholders towards standardization of products’ achieves the first position
whereas factor ‘Trust among the members of the supply chain’ stays behind at last position. This work is helpful for
managers and practitioners to create a coordinated and focused system within the supply chain.
Arulrajah, A. A., & Opatha, H. H. D. N. P. (2016). Analytical and theoretical perspectives on green human resource
management: A simplified underpinning. International Business Research, 9 (12), 153.
Benn, S., & Bolton, D. (2011). Key concepts in corporate social responsibility. Sage.
Bentley, M. (2008). Planning for change: guidelines for national programmes on sustainable consumption and
Callenbach, E., Capra, F., LUTZ, L., Goldman, L., Lutz, R., & Marburg, S. (1993). Ecomanagement: The elmwood
guide to ecological auditing and sustainable business. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Chams, N., & García-Blandón, J. (2019). On the importance of sustainable human resource management for the
adoption of sustainable development goals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 109-122.
Dahl, A. L. (2012). Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, 14-19.
Das, S. C., & Singh, M. R. K. (2016). Green hrm and organizational sustainability: an empirical review. Kegees
Journal of Social Science, 8, 227-236.
Govindarajulu, N., & Daily, B. F. (2004). Motivating employees for environmental improvement. Industrial
Management & Data Systems, 104(4), 364-372.
Graedel, T. E., Allwood, J., Birat, J. P., Buchert, M., Hagelüken, C., Reck, B. K., ... & Sonnemann, G. (2011). What
do we know about metal recycling rates?. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(3), 355-366.
Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation,
understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177-189.
Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., & Tavana, M. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic
network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178-
Hesselbarth, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Educating change agents for sustainability–learnings from the first
sustainability management master of business administration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 24-36.
Ju-Long, D. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1(5), 288-294.
Ju-long, D. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of Grey System, 1(1), 1-24.
Kausar, K., Garg, D., & Luthra, S. (2017). Key enablers to implement sustainable supply chain management
practices: An Indian insight. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 89-104.
Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Van Erck, R. P. (2005). Assessing the sustainability performances of
industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(4), 373-385.
Pandey, S., Viswanathan, V., & Kamboj, P. (2016). Sustainable green HRM–importance and factors affecting
successful implementation in organizations. International Journal of Research in Management and Business, 2(3),
Journal of Graphic Era University
Vol. 8, Issue 2, 62-70, 2020
ISSN: 0975-1416 (Print), 2456-4281 (Online)
Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management
Perspectives, 24(1), 34-45.
Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (2015). Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis
approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 343-359.
Rettab, B., Brik, A. B., & Mellahi, K. (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social
responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: the case of dubai. Journal of Business
Ethics, 89(3), 371-390.
Reuter, C., Foerstl, K. A. I., Hartmann, E. V. I., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: the
role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45-
Schäfer, M., Jaeger-Erben, M., & Bamberg, S. (2012). Life events as windows of opportunity for changing towards
sustainable consumption patterns?. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 65-84.
Shibin, K. T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., & Mishra, D. (2016). Sustainable consumption and
production: need, challenges and further research directions. International Journal of Process Management and
Benchmarking, 6(4), 447-468.
Song, W., Ming, X., & Han, Y. (2014). Prioritising technical attributes in QFD under vague environment: a rough-
grey relational analysis approach. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5528-5545.
Spaargaren, G., & Van-Vliet, B. (2000). Lifestyles, consumption and the environment: The ecological
modernization of domestic consumption. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 50-76.
Visser, W., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and the individual: Understanding what drives
sustainability professionals as change agents. Available at SSRN 1559087.